THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS
CSG GOVERNING BOARD
Resolution on Animal Guardianship and Liability Legislation
WHEREAS, the existing legal and legislative framework that defines the
relationship between livestock producers and their animals, pet owners and their
pets, and animal enterprises including but not limited to those defined in Section
2 of the Animal Welfare Act, (7USCS § 2132) maintains a healthy balance
between the rights of these individuals and enterprises and the responsible
care and well-being of all animals; and
WHEREAS, this balance, coupled with the strict, consistent and ongoing
enforcement of anti-cruelty laws promotes the responsible care of animals, deters
abuse and promotes owners access to affordable veterinary care; and
WHEREAS, this legal balance is currently being threatened by a growing
movement whose ultimate objective is to give pets, livestock and other animals
the same or similar legal rights and standing as people; and
WHEREAS, some are attempting to further their objectives by advocating
legislation that would reclassify pets, livestock or other animal "owners"
as "guardians", claiming that reclassification is just a harmless
recognition of the increasing value and relationship we now place on pets, livestock
and other animals; and
WHEREAS, guardianship statues would undermine the protective care that
owners can provide for their animals and the freedom of choice owners now are
free to exercise, and could permit third parties to petition courts for custody
of a pet, livestock or animal for which they do not approve of the husbandry
practices; and
WHEREAS, guardianship status would permit challenging in a court of law
the course of treatment an animal's owner and veterinarian decide on, or permit
animal owners and veterinarians to be sued for providing what another individual
may regard as inadequate care; and
WHEREAS, some are advocating legislation to expand tort law to permit the
recovery of losses for emotional distress and loss of companionship - legally
called non-economic damages - against veterinarians, livestock producers, animal
enterprises and others that provide animals with goods and services, even though
such recovery is typically not available for injuries to close relatives in
marital and parental relationships; and
WHEREAS, the cumulative impact of these initiatives would be
counterproductive because it would limit - or even eliminate - the animal owners'
ability to freely choose appropriate treatment for their animals, set off a
chain of events that would inevitably increase the cost of livestock production
and the cost of the animal's well-being, and as a result would ultimately erode
access to affordable and high quality animal health care; and
BE IT NOW THEREFORE RESOLVED, that The Council of State Governments opposes
legislation that reclassifies pet, livestock or animal owners as guardians or
that otherwise alters the legal status of the animals; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that The Council of State Governments opposes legislation
permitting the recovery of non-economic damages for the loss or injury of a
pet, livestock or other animal. The tort of negligent infliction of emotion
distress should not be expanded to allow people to recover emotional distress
damages in litigation involving animals. Loss of companionship, a measure of
damages arising out of marital and parental relationships, should not be recoverable
in litigation involving animals, particularly when it is not available for the
loss of close family relatives.
Adopted this 29th Day of September, 2004 at the
CSG Annual Meeting and State Trends Leadership Forum
In Anchorage, Alaska
__________________________________
______________________________
Governor Frank Murkowski State
Senator John Hottinger
2004 CSG President 2004
CSG Chair
THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS
CSG GOVERNING BOARD
MEMBERS-ONLY INFORMATION
State Laws Book
NABR tracks state legislation that could potentially impact biomedical
research and indexes it in a searchable and user-friendly database. The
NABR State Laws Book includes proposed legislation as well as existing
state statutes. Links to the text of the proposed legislation and
statutes are provided where available.
Search the State Law Book
|